[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7788.1188328346@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 15:12:26 -0400
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
Cc: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <linux@...blig.org>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>, neilb@...e.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add source address to sunrpc svc errors
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 17:43:33 EDT, "J. Bruce Fields" said:
> Looks like a reasonable idea to me, thanks! Any objection to just
> calling it "svc_printk" instead of "svc_printkerr"?
>
> I also wonder whether these shouldn't all be dprintk's instead of
> printk's. One misbehaving client could create a lot of noise in the
> logs.
I shouldn't have to rebuild my kernel with debugging enabled just to see
who is throwing trash at my machine. printk(KERN_INFO maybe and/or using
a printk_ratelimit.
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists