[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200708281559.11181.phillips@phunq.net>
Date:	Tue, 28 Aug 2007 15:59:09 -0700
From:	Daniel Phillips <phillips@...nq.net>
To:	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
Cc:	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>, Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
	Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...il.com>,
	Andy Isaacson <adi@...apodia.org>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
	Tech Board Discuss 
	<Tech-board-discuss@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	ksummit-2007-discuss@...nk.org
Subject: Re: [Tech-board-discuss] Re: [Ksummit-2007-discuss] Re: Linux Foundation Technical Advisory Board Elections
On Friday 24 August 2007 03:45, Theodore Tso wrote:
> > As I said; what's wrong with just using SPI membership?  It's not
> > like it is remotely hard for kernel hackers to gain membership in
> > SPI.  And somebody else takes care of the bureaucracy for you.
>
> Given the huge overlap between SPI membership and Debian membership,
> and then taking a look at the craziness that takes place on various
> Debian mailing lists, such as but not limited to debian-legal, I'm
> quite convinced that this would be a baaaaaad idea.
Hi Ted,
Ever watched a legislative assembly at work?  A bad idea perhaps, but 
the best that has been discovered so far.
Regards,
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
