linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] trivial - convert "for(foo=0;foo<NR_CPUS;foo++)" to "for_each_possible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 27 Aug 2007 17:31:05 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	Mike Travis <travis@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] trivial - convert "for(foo=0;foo<NR_CPUS;foo++)" to
	"for_each_possible_cpu(foo)"

On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 17:12 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Right now, pretty much every instance of NR_CPUS in the tree is a flag
> which says "old, krufty, fixme".

I thought of that when I changed them.

Perhaps the new for_each_possible_cpu code can
now be more easily inspected/transformed by the
appropriate parties to for_each_(online|present)_cpu.

cheers, Joe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/