[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070828091217.GA1645@frankl.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 02:12:17 -0700
From: Stephane Eranian <eranian@....hp.com>
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
Cc: Björn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@....de>,
ak@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21
Daniel,
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 04:07:54PM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 15:55 -0700, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>
> > Yet the model name looks strange. So we need to run one more test,
> > as the fam/model is not enough. What we need to check is whether or
> > not this processor implements architectural perfmon or not.
> >
> > Could you please compile and run the attached program and send me
> > the output?
>
> The output below is all the output ..
>
> eax=0x7280201: version=1 num_cnt=2
>
Then you have a Core Duo processor and the commit from Bjorn should
fix the problem. If it does not, then there is something else wrong.
Unfortunately, I do not have a Core Duo machine to try and reproduce.
--
-Stephane
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists