linux-kernel - Re: CFS review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1188403075.21502.158.camel@koto.keithp.com>
Date:	Wed, 29 Aug 2007 08:57:55 -0700
From:	Keith Packard <keith.packard@...el.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	keith.packard@...el.com, Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: CFS review

On Wed, 2007-08-29 at 10:04 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> is that old enough to not have the smart X scheduler?

The smart scheduler went into the server in like 2000. I don't think
you've got any systems that old. XFree86 4.1 or 4.2, I can't remember
which.

> (probably 
> the GLX bug you mentioned) so i cannot reproduce the bug.

With X server 1.3, I'm getting consistent crashes with two glxgear
instances running. So, if you're getting any output, it's better than my
situation.

-- 
keith.packard@...el.com

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)