[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070829.012916.02298847.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 01:29:16 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: ossthema@...ibm.com
Cc: jchapman@...alix.com, shemminger@...ux-foundation.org,
akepner@....com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, raisch@...ibm.com,
themann@...ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, meder@...ibm.com, tklein@...ibm.com,
stefan.roscher@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: RFC: issues concerning the next NAPI interface
From: Jan-Bernd Themann <ossthema@...ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 09:10:15 +0200
> In the end I want to reduce the CPU utilization. And one way
> to do that is LRO which also works only well if there are more
> then just a very few packets to aggregate. So at least our
> driver (eHEA) would benefit from a mix of timer based polling
> and plain NAPI (depending on load situations).
>
> If there is no need for a generic mechanism for this kind of
> network adapters, then we can just leave this to each device
> driver.
No objections from me either way, if something works then
fine.
Let's come back to this once you have a tested sample implementation
that does what you want, ok?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists