[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46D54CF6.7060009@garzik.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 06:39:50 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: HighPoint Linux Team <linux@...hpoint-tech.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
James.Bottomley@...elEye.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hptiop: adding new firmware interface and more PCI device
IDs
HighPoint Linux Team wrote:
> + if (hba->firmware_version > 0x01020000 || hba->interface_version > 0x01020000) {
[...]
> + if (hba->firmware_version > 0x01020000 ||
> + hba->interface_version > 0x01020000) {
Rather than repeating this test, you should do it once at probe time,
and set a "new interface" single-bit flag in some hptiop_hba field.
Less maintenance intensive, less prone to error, and removes expensive
tests from the driver hotpath.
> static struct pci_device_id hptiop_id_table[] = {
> - { PCI_DEVICE(0x1103, 0x3220) },
> - { PCI_DEVICE(0x1103, 0x3320) },
> + { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_TTI, 0x3220) },
> + { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_TTI, 0x3320) },
> + { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_TTI, 0x3520) },
> + { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_TTI, 0x4320) },
> {},
Using the PCI_VDEVICE() macro can make this even shorter:
{ PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x4320) }
Regards,
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists