| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20070830134506.GB2778@ff.dom.local> Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 15:45:06 +0200 From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...pl> To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net> Cc: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>, linville@...driver.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, Xavier Bestel <xavier.bestel@...e.fr>, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] Net: ath5k, license is GPLv2 On 30-08-2007 13:59, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Wed, 2007-08-29 at 15:13 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote: > >> How about asking for changes to be dual-licenced too ? > > In theory, that could work, but in practice relying on functions that > the Linux kernel offers in GPLv2-only headers etc. will make the result > GPLv2 anyway, and disentangling it would be a nightmare. > Why? Very good point, but, in my opinion, it should be still resonable for both sides: it simply means such changes are mostly unusable for the other side, but nobody is going to waste time for marking all these places, or care about suing if accidentally the changes, after some adaptation, are usable for the other side. Unless you think or know that "#include xyz" or "print_linux_way()" should add more than these (maybe unusable) words or lines only? Jarek P. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists