lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 10:01:59 -0400 From: "Mike Frysinger" <vapier.adi@...il.com> To: "Jiri Kosina" <jkosina@...e.cz> Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386 and x86_64: randomize brk() On 8/30/07, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz> wrote: > From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz> > > i386 and x86_64: randomize brk() > > This patch randomizes the location of the heap (brk) for i386 and x86_64. > The range is randomized in the range starting at current brk location up > to 0x02000000 offset for both architectures. This, together with > pie-executable-randomization.patch and > pie-executable-randomization-fix.patch, should make the address space > randomization on i386 and x86_64 complete. > > Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz> does it really make sense to stick stubs into no-mmu ports which cannot utilize the ELF binfmt ? -mike - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists