linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] i386 and x86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8bd0f97a0708300701r1f36bc0anc45b9cad4a11f2ef@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 30 Aug 2007 10:01:59 -0400
From:	"Mike Frysinger" <vapier.adi@...il.com>
To:	"Jiri Kosina" <jkosina@...e.cz>
Cc:	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386 and x86_64: randomize brk()

On 8/30/07, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz> wrote:
> From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
>
> i386 and x86_64: randomize brk()
>
> This patch randomizes the location of the heap (brk) for i386 and x86_64.
> The range is randomized in the range starting at current brk location up
> to 0x02000000 offset for both architectures. This, together with
> pie-executable-randomization.patch and
> pie-executable-randomization-fix.patch, should make the address space
> randomization on i386 and x86_64 complete.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>

does it really make sense to stick stubs into no-mmu ports which
cannot utilize the ELF binfmt ?
-mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/