linux-kernel - Re: Designers and Builders (was: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases?)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <26616.1188484286@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date:	Thu, 30 Aug 2007 10:31:26 -0400
From:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To:	Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Designers and Builders (was: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases?)

On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 07:31:24 +0300, Al Boldi said:
> Adrian Bunk wrote
> > Tracking feature or implementation suggestions wouldn't make sense.
> > Consider e.g. that there are several people on linux-kernel who often
> > write what they think the kernel should do but who never write a single
> > line of code themselves. There's no value in tracking such stuff.
> 
> There are designers, and there are builders.
> 
> Can you tell me who is more important?

The problem is not builders, or designers - this list has plenty of both.

What Adrian is talking about are the people who go to designers and say
"Build me something blue, with a design that doesn't work with the VFS".

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped