[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46D6E838.3020502@tmr.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 11:54:32 -0400
From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Natalie Protasevich <protasnb@...il.com>,
David Rees <drees76@...il.com>,
Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>,
Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Björn Steinbrink
<B.Steinbrink@....de>, eranian@....hp.com, ak@...e.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was Re:
nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21)
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 12:42:02AM -0700, Natalie Protasevich wrote:
>> ...
>> Then I think bugzilla needs:
>> adding more categories such as security,
>
> "security" would be a flag like "regression", not a category.
>
>> system calls (lots of
>> implementation suggestions for posix and non-posix ones),
>> ...
>
> Bugzilla is for tracking bugs, not for discussing possible
> kernel features.
>
> Tracking feature or implementation suggestions wouldn't make sense.
> Consider e.g. that there are several people on linux-kernel who often
> write what they think the kernel should do but who never write a single
> line of code themselves. There's no value in tracking such stuff.
>
That's an interesting viewpoint, only programmers have useful
thoughts... ignoring users, people who have CS degrees but don't code,
etc. I would think there's value in any rational suggestions which
include technical justification for the suggestion.
--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>
"We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists