linux-kernel - Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 29 Aug 2007 18:21:59 -0700
From:	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
To:	eranian@....hp.com
Cc:	B.Steinbrink@....de, ak@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21

On Wed, 2007-08-29 at 14:24 -0700, Stephane Eranian wrote:


> Now on Core Duo, there is no PEBS anyway, so it is okay to use counter 0
> for NMI. The problem is that the detection code in perfctr-watchdog.c
> treats a Core Duo and a Core 2 Duo the same way as they both have the
> X86_FEATURE_ARCH_PERFMON bit set.
> 
> I have attached a patch with handle the case of the Core Duo. Unfortunately,
> I do not own one so I cannot test it. I would appreciate if you could
> try re-applying my counter 0 -> 1 patch + this new one to see if you
> have the problem with the NMI getting stuck.

I tested your patch .. The system doesn't hang, but the NMI seems to
disappear .. The check_nmi_watchdog() is not called, and the NMI never
actually starts firing .. Is that what you had intended?

Daniel

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/