linux-kernel - Re: [patch 4/4] Port of blktrace to the Linux Kernel Markers.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070830183758.GB15657@Krystal>
Date:	Thu, 30 Aug 2007 14:37:58 -0400
From:	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 4/4] Port of blktrace to the Linux Kernel Markers.

* Christoph Hellwig (hch@...radead.org) wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 12:05:44PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > Here is the first stage of a port of blktrace to the Linux Kernel Markers. The
> > advantage of this port is that it minimizes the impact on the running when
> > blktrace is not active.
> > 
> > A few remarks : this patch has the positive effect of removing some code
> > from the block io tracing hot paths, minimizing the i-cache impact in a
> > system where the io tracing is compiled in but inactive.
> > 
> > It also moves the blk tracing code from a header (and therefore from the
> > body of the instrumented functions) to a separate C file.
> > 
> > There, as soon as one device has to be traced, all devices have to
> > execute the tracing function call when they pass by the instrumentation site.
> > This is slower than the previous inline function which tested the condition
> > quickly.
> > 
> > It does not make the code smaller, since I left all the specialized
> > tracing functions for requests, bio, generic, remap, which would go away
> > once a generic infrastructure is in place to serialize the information
> > passed to the marker. This is mostly why I consider it as a step towards the
> > full improvements that could bring the markers.
> 
> I like this as it moves the whole tracing code out of line.  It would
> be nice if we could make blktrace a module with this, but we'd need
> to change the interface away from an ioctl on the block device for that.
> 
> Btw, something that really shows here and what I noticed in my sputrace
> aswell is that there is a lot of boilerplate code due to the varargs
> trace handlers.  We really need some way to auto-generate the boilerplate
> for the trace function to avoid coding this up everywhere.

Or we can use a vprintk-like function to parse the format string and
serialize the information into trace buffers. I prefer this latter
option because, overall, it will localize the probes in a few bytes of
functions instead of duplicating the memory and instruction cache
required by multiple serializing functions.

I have the code ready, but I do not want to flood LKML with patches
neither....

Mathieu


-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/