lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 15:42:55 -0700 From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> To: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Daniel Drake <dsd@...too.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Ulrich Kunitz <kune@...ne-taler.de>, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Don't needlessly initialize variable to NULL in zd_chip (was: Re: [PATCH 13/30] net: Don't do pointless kmalloc return value casts in zd1211 driver) On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 00:30:31 +0200 Jesper Juhl wrote: > On Friday 31 August 2007 00:19:53 Joe Perches wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-08-30 at 22:20 +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote: > > > Ok, I must admit I didn't check with sparse since it seemed pointless > > > - we usually never cast void pointers to other pointer types, > > > specifically because the C language nicely guarantees that the right > > > thing will happen without the cast. Sometimes we have to cast them to > > > integer types, su sure we need the cast there. But what on earth > > > makes a "zd_addr_t *" so special that we have to explicitly cast a > > > "void *" to that type? > > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=117113743902549&w=1 > > > > Thank you for that link Joe. > > I'm not sure I agree with the __nocast, but I respect that this is > the maintainers choice. > > But, I still think the first chunk of the patch that removes the > initial variable initialization makes sense. > Initializing the variable to NULL is pointless since it'll never be > used before the kmalloc() call. So here's a revised patch that just > gets rid of that little detail. BTW: http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=118831813500769&w=2 > No need to initialize to NULL when variable is never used before > it's assigned the return value of a kmalloc() call. > > Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com> > --- > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/zd1211rw/zd_chip.c b/drivers/net/wireless/zd1211rw/zd_chip.c > index c39f198..30872fe 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/zd1211rw/zd_chip.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/zd1211rw/zd_chip.c > @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ int zd_ioread32v_locked(struct zd_chip *chip, u32 *values, const zd_addr_t *addr > { > int r; > int i; > - zd_addr_t *a16 = (zd_addr_t *)NULL; > + zd_addr_t *a16; > u16 *v16; > unsigned int count16; --- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code *** - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists