linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] docs: ramdisk/initrd/initramfs corrections

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20070830161316.b04f041d.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date:	Thu, 30 Aug 2007 16:13:16 -0700
From:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
	"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	akpm <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, bos@...pentine.com,
	werner@...esberger.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: ramdisk/initrd/initramfs corrections

On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 15:41:27 -0700 H. Peter Anvin wrote:

> Rob Landley wrote:
> > On Thursday 30 August 2007 1:28:17 pm Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >> On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >>
> >> ...
> >>
> >>> The old "ramdisk=<ram_size>" has been changed to
> >>> "ramdisk_size=<ram_size>" to make it clearer.  The original
> >>> "ramdisk=<ram_size>" has been kept around for compatibility reasons,
> >>> but it may be removed in the future.
> >> ...
> >>
> >> i just the other day submitted a patch to remove that backward
> >> compatibility, and the m68k portion of it has already been acked by
> >> geert uytterhoeven.

I couldn't find it.  Can you provide a pointer to it?

> > Could you mention it in feature-removal-schedule.txt?  (People check that for 
> > warning of upcoming changes that impact existing code.  They may not notice 
> > something elsewhere after they've got it working...)
> > 
> 
> The same objection applies to this as to the previous one.  In that 
> respect, an Ack from a maintainer of an almost unused architecture is 
> meaningless (sorry, Geert.)

Peter, what are you objecting to, Rob's comment, Robert's comment,
Robert's patch, or my patch?

Thanks.
---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/