linux-kernel - Re: [1/4] 2.6.23-rc4: known regressions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <46D66D49.20300@l4x.org>
Date:	Thu, 30 Aug 2007 09:10:01 +0200
From:	Jan Dittmer <jdi@....org>
To:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
CC:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>,
	Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [1/4] 2.6.23-rc4: known regressions

Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> 
>> Christoph, is your fix in -mm suitable for 2.6.23, or how else should 
>> this regression be fixed for 2.6.23?
> 
> Looks like this is just alpha and a certain particular compiler version? 

binutils 2.15.95, gcc 3.3.6 and I could update to 4.0.4 or something
more recent I guess. And yes, it's only alpha.

Of which file do you want the objdump?

Jan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/