[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <OFD83AA06B.BECCA59D-ONC1257348.0030CA33-C1257348.003132C0@de.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 10:57:28 +0200
From: Joachim Fenkes <FENKES@...ibm.com>
To: linas@...tin.ibm.com (Linas Vepstas)
Cc: Christoph Raisch <raisch@...ibm.com>,
Jan-Bernd Themann <themann@...ibm.com>,
jschopp <jschopp@...tin.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
LinuxPPC-Dev <linuxppc-dev@...abs.org>,
Nathan Lynch <ntl@...ox.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Paul Mackerras <pmac@....ibm.com>,
Stefan Roscher <stefan.roscher@...ibm.com>,
Thomas Q Klein <tklein@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.23] ibmebus: Prevent bus_id collisions
linas@...tin.ibm.com (Linas Vepstas) wrote on 30.08.2007 23:28:16:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 04:00:56PM +0200, Joachim Fenkes wrote:
> >
> > Plus, I rather like using
> > the full_name since it also contains a descriptive name as opposed to
> > being just nondescript numbers, helping the layman (ie user) to make
sense
> > out of a dev_id.
>
> [...]
> Location codes are nice.
I sure agree with you. Still, they're not unique, so we can't use them as
bus_id. That's why we're having this discussion at all.
What I meant was "I like using the full_name over using the device address
/ DRC index / you-name-it only". Location code is right out.
Cheers,
Joachim
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists