lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <379fb4870708310513o46a721c6l3080179ccbb8f519@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 31 Aug 2007 14:13:26 +0200
From:	"anon... anon.al" <anon.asdf@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Nonblocking call may block in a mutex? Nonblocking call after poll may fail?

Hi!

This is a driver-related question on non-blocking writes and poll.

Setup:
there is a single output-buffer (in kernel-space) of 24 bytes for
writes from all processes A, B, and C: each process is restricted to
use at most 8 bytes: 8*3 = 24
(until that data is handled (interrupt-handler...))

Question:
If this output-buffer has "4-bytes space remaining for process A",
then a non-blocking write of process A could still encounter a locked
mutex, if process B is busy writing to the output-buffer.

Should process A now block/sleep until that mutex is free and it can
access the output-buffer (and it's 4 bytes space)?

What about a non-blocking (write-) poll of process A: if the poll call
succeeds (the output buffer has space remaining for process A), and
process A now performs a non-blocking write: what happens if A
encounters a blocked mutex, since process B is busy writing to the
output-buffer.
a) Should A block until the mutex is available?
b) Should A return -EAGAIN, even though the poll call succeeded?
c) Should it be impossible for this to happen! i.e. -> should process
A already "have" the mutex in question, when the poll call succeeds
(thus preventing B from writing to the output buffer)

For c) What if process A "has" the mutex, but never does the
non-blocking write. Then no process can write, since the mutex is held
by process A...


I'll appreciate any answer, or pointer to relevant information.

Thanks Albert
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ