linux-kernel - RE: recent nfs change causes autofs regression

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1188587601.19730.45.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org>
Date:	Fri, 31 Aug 2007 15:13:21 -0400
From:	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>
To:	Hua Zhong <hzhong@...il.com>
Cc:	'Linus Torvalds' <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	'Frank van Maarseveen' <frankvm@...nkvm.com>,
	'Linux Kernel Mailing List' <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: RE: recent nfs change causes autofs regression

On Fri, 2007-08-31 at 11:47 -0700, Hua Zhong wrote:
> This patch fixes the problem for me, thanks.
> 
> Is this patch changing the behavior of "sharecache" to
> "try-to-share-cache-if-possible", or adding a third behavior? If the user
> explicitly asks for "-o sharecache", does he get an error back if the mount
> options mismatch?

There has never been a 'sharecache' flag as far as the kernel is
concerned. The default behaviour has always been to share.

Trond


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/