linux-kernel - Re: recent nfs change causes autofs regression

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1188536658.6626.98.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org>
Date:	Fri, 31 Aug 2007 01:04:18 -0400
From:	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Frank van Maarseveen <frankvm@...nkvm.com>,
	Hua Zhong <hzhong@...il.com>,
	'Linux Kernel Mailing List' <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: recent nfs change causes autofs regression

On Thu, 2007-08-30 at 21:59 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 31 Aug 2007, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> > 
> > It did not. The previous behaviour was to always silently override the
> > user mount options.
> 
> ..so it still worked for any sane setup, at least.
> 
> You broke that. Hua gave good reasons for why he cannot use the current 
> kernel. It's a regression.
> 
> In other words, the new behaviour is *worse* than the behaviour you 
> consider to be the incorrect one.

So you are saying that it is acceptable for the kernel to decide
unilaterally to override mount options? Why aren't we doing that for any
other filesystem than NFS?

Trond

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/