linux-kernel - Re: the Linux kernel, testsuites, and maybe *you*

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8bd0f97a0709011552u687bcdc7i3a9154b24523796d@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 1 Sep 2007 18:52:39 -0400
From:	"Mike Frysinger" <vapier.adi@...il.com>
To:	"Robin Getz" <rgetz@...ckfin.uclinux.org>
Cc:	"Linux Kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, mbligh@...igh.org
Subject: Re: the Linux kernel, testsuites, and maybe *you*

On 9/1/07, Robin Getz <rgetz@...ckfin.uclinux.org> wrote:
> On Fri 31 Aug 2007 17:22, Mike Frysinger pondered:
> > is there any sort of standard for testing and integration into
> > mainline ?  in the Blackfin world, we've been developing little
> > external kernel modules and adding them to our own testsuite, but
> > often times these things are not Blackfin specific.  case in point,
> > we're integrating a string testsuite to make sure all of the fun str*
> > and mem* functions are sane and operate as they expected, but rather
> > than having just Blackfin benefit here, i'd like to see this pushed
> > upstream ...
>
> I know there have been some discussions at past OLS about some testing that
> Martin was working on.
>
> http://www.linuxsymposium.org/2006/view_abstract.php?content_key=13
>
> But I think this was more functional tests, less unit tests that what you are
> talking/asking about.
>
> http://test.kernel.org/functional/index.html
>
> Also - If I remember - most of the existing tests were for a self hosted
> environment - and might not be well suited to embedded (like Blackfin) which
> requires cross compile, and pretty thin runtime environment (uClibc +
> busybox's msh as shell).

i flipped through the autotest code a bit but i dont think this can do
what i'm looking for.  it appears to be a mix of LTP provides and what
we have for our Blackfin test infrastructure -- iow, all userspace
stuff and no real way of exercising kernel internals.
-mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/