| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0709010831320.11617@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr> Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 08:35:08 +0200 (CEST) From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de> To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org> cc: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: maturity and status and attributes, oh my! On Aug 31 2007 18:02, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Robert P. J. Day wrote: >> it may be that some people had a different understanding of what was >> meant by "maturity" than i did. what *i* meant by that attribute is >> a feature's current position in the normal software life cycle, and >> that would be one of: >> >> experimental -> normal (stable) -> deprecated -> obsolete > > People who actually write and maintain code disagree with your imaginative > interpretation. Might I point to the "designers and builders" thread... http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/30/279 :) Jan -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists