[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0709010504020.27923@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 05:06:01 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: maturity and status and attributes, oh my!
On Sat, 1 Sep 2007, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
> On Aug 31 2007 18:02, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >> it may be that some people had a different understanding of what was
> >> meant by "maturity" than i did. what *i* meant by that attribute is
> >> a feature's current position in the normal software life cycle, and
> >> that would be one of:
> >>
> >> experimental -> normal (stable) -> deprecated -> obsolete
> >
> > People who actually write and maintain code disagree with your imaginative
> > interpretation.
>
> Might I point to the "designers and builders" thread...
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/30/279 :)
i'm trying to figure out whether i fall into the "insane" or the
"hmmm, interesting, we'll get back to you" camp. :-)
http://youtube.com/watch?v=ZF3r5lAvhYI
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
========================================================================
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists