| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2007 11:47:48 +0200 From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de> To: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com> CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: maturity and status and attributes, oh my! Robert P. J. Day wrote: > given the possible > interpretations of EXPERIMENTAL that i hadn't considered until now, > maybe it really *does* make sense to tag something as both > EXPERIMENTAL and, say, DEPRECATED (does it?). In theory maybe, for communication purposes perhaps rather not. The reasoning why a feature is deprecated will typically include the gotchas which caused the feature to be considered experimental, if such gotchas still apply. -- Stefan Richter -=====-=-=== =--= ----= http://arcgraph.de/sr/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists