linux-kernel - Re: [2/4] 2.6.23-rc4: known regressions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9a8748490709020519i222bab93iad2c4fc1e59a41c3@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 2 Sep 2007 14:19:37 +0200
From:	"Jesper Juhl" <jesper.juhl@...il.com>
To:	"Takashi Iwai" <tiwai@...e.de>
Cc:	"Ivan N. Zlatev" <contact@...z.net>,
	"Michal Piotrowski" <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com>,
	"Thomas Meyer" <thomas@...3r.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [2/4] 2.6.23-rc4: known regressions

On 29/08/07, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de> wrote:
> At Wed, 29 Aug 2007 18:42:56 +0300,
> Ivan N. Zlatev wrote:
> >
> > On 8/29/07, Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > ALSA
> > >
> > > Subject         : Master volume control broken
> > > References      : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/18/46
> > > Last known good : ?
> > > Submitter       : Thomas Meyer <thomas@...3r.de>
> > > Caused-By       : Ivan N. Zlatev <contact@...z.net>
> > >                   commit 5d5d3bc3eddf2ad97b2cb090b92580e7fed6cee1
> > > Handled-By      : Ivan N. Zlatev <contact@...z.net>
> > > Status          : problem is being debugged
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am not the one to handle the issue. I have just supplied the
> > pinconfigs for the intel mac cards and assisted with logs/debug
> > information, so I happen to be more of an end user. I am not familiar
> > with the code base of the Intel HDA Codec. Takashi Iwai is the one
> > with the knowledge to fix the problem.
>
> ... but without the hardware :-<
>
> IMO, this is actually no real regression.  In the earlier verison, you
> didn't have controls for multiple outputs, thus the mixer control was
> named as Master.  Now you do have multiple individual controls, and
> thus there is no master any more, instead.  That's the trade-off.
>
Shouldn't the goal be to have both?  Multiple individual controls as
well as a Master that adjusts them all.  That would also solve Thomas'
problem.
As I see it you broke Thomas' setup and that in my book is a regression.

-- 
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>
Don't top-post  http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please      http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/