[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1188749628.4028.6.camel@johannes.berg>
Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2007 18:13:48 +0200
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: Christian Kujau <lists@...dbynature.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RTNL: assertion failed at net/core/dev.c
On Sun, 2007-09-02 at 18:05 +0200, Christian Kujau wrote:
> but given the amount of changes currently
> going into net/ I thought this might be interesting:
>
> [15604.137408] RTNL: assertion failed at net/core/dev.c (2595)
> [15604.138807] [<c038c612>] __dev_set_promiscuity+0xc2/0xd0
> [15604.139163] [<c038c9bb>] dev_set_promiscuity+0x1b/0x40
> [15604.139515] [<f91cb3fb>] VNetBridgeStartPromisc+0x2b/0x50 [vmnet]
Not sure why this would be interesting. Clearly, dev_set_promiscuity is
called without the RTNL held while it should be. And see who the caller
is?
johannes
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (191 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists