[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46DAEFA5.70800@oracle.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2007 10:15:17 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
CC: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/x86-64 PCI domain support
Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On Sat, 01 Sep 2007 18:40:27 -0400 Jeff Garzik wrote:
>>
>>> Andi Kleen wrote:
>>>>>> The second function is redundant?
>>>>> No, it's a hook we must implement, when CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS is enabled.
>>>> Then the other function is redundant.
>>> No, both functions are required by the interface.
>>
>> by what interface? and why, please? (instead of just stating
>> "required")
>
> grep for CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS in arch code and include/linux/pci.h.
Thanks, I get it.
> This is normal "arch" interface: you enable a define, and a group of
> functions is assumed to be present. Otherwise (!defined), a set of stub
> no-ops is activated for your arch.
>
> I have implemented the [small] group of functions the code assumes to be
> present, when CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS is enabled, like all the other arches
> that implement PCI domain support.
+#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS
+static inline int pci_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus)
+{
+ struct pci_sysdata *sd = bus->sysdata;
+ return sd->domain;
+}
+
+static inline int pci_proc_domain(struct pci_bus *bus)
+{
+ return pci_domain_nr(bus);
+}
+#endif /* CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS */
So if CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS=y, proc_proc_domain() decides to print the domain nr
in /proc iff the domain nr != 0 ? so that the /proc file format is
different depending on the domain nr (0 vs. !0) ?
I suppose that is similar to what arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_64.c does
with hose->buid. I think that I had rather see the domain nr printed
whenever CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS=y... oh well.
--
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists