[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070902012353.GC475@flower.upol.cz>
Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 03:23:53 +0200
From: Oleg Verych <olecom@...wer.upol.cz>
To: Bj?rn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@....de>
Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, Matti Aarnio <matti.aarnio@...iler.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [OT] good job guys with the anti-spam !
On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 02:39:36AM +0200, Bj?rn Steinbrink wrote:
[]
>
> Ehrm, you want everyone who wants to start a new thread to:
>
> - send an email
> - await response from the mail server
> - send the same email again as a reply to the first one
No. Send a ticket request and then organize patch bomb with gotten ticket
in `references:' or `in-reply-to'. New discussion thread: be organized
have a pull of tickets, care about what you post, how you post, etc.
Those new posters will get current footer with more info -- no problem.
People in thread need no work at all. Linus, Andrew, Jeff, DaveM etc.
are likely to be in white list with no additional work also.
It's anti-spam thing, but maybe it can be kind of netiquette, which is
forgotten in modern XML Internet world. I didn't live in that time, but
that's my impression. In case if efficient algo/logic will be implemented
it will save CPU power, because all processing is done in header part of
the message and it's a token lookup. Switch on your imagination and
think, what can be done in another way, why not?
____
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists