linux-kernel - Re: RTNL: assertion failed at net/core/dev.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.0.999.0709022003110.7103@sheep.housecafe.de>
Date:	Sun, 2 Sep 2007 20:04:09 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Christian Kujau <lists@...dbynature.de>
To:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
cc:	Christian Kujau <lists@...dbynature.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	johannes@...solutions.net
Subject: Re: RTNL: assertion failed at net/core/dev.c

On Sun, 2 Sep 2007, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> Vendor module calls kernel api incorrectly. dev_set_promiscuity requires
> that the calling thread hold rtnl mutex (ie call rtnl_lock). It's their bug,
> netdev doesn't want to hear about it.

OK, that's all I needed to know. Thank you both for your comments!

Christian.
-- 
BOFH excuse #435:

Internet shut down due to maintenance
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/