[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m1d4x0zvri.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2007 13:56:33 -0600
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sysctl: Deprecate sys_sysctl in a user space visible fashion.
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net> writes:
>
> If you're going to add a new api, you might as well go with the sysctl-by-name
> patch above, which looks reasonably small and simple to me from a very quick
> glance at a 2.6.0-era patch.
>
> The advantage of breaking /proc/sys into a separate filesystem doesn't
> introduce a new API (although possibly a new line in the init scripts), so
> existing software doesn't have to change to use it, which is good. It
> increases orthogonality and granularity, which embedded guys like me are
> generally in favor of. :)
- I think sysctlfs makes sense.
- I think all that is left is superblock handling and some backward
compatibility magic. (Using the follow_link trick to automatically
mount /proc/sys)
All of the rest of the code pretty much lives in fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c
already.
I have some other priorities to deal with first but if no one does the
work before I get there I will probably implement that eventually.
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists