lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 21:39:02 -0400 From: "Constantine A. Murenin" <mureninc@...il.com> To: "Jeff Garzik" <jeff@...zik.org> Cc: "Jason Dixon" <jason@...ongroup.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, jirislaby@...il.com, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk Subject: Re: That whole "Linux stealing our code" thing On 01/09/07, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org> wrote: > Jason Dixon wrote: > > Once the grantor (Reyk) releases his code under that license, it must > > remain. You are free to derive work and redistribute under your > > license, but the original copyright and license permission remains > > intact. Many other entities (Microsoft, Apple, Sun, etc) have used BSD > > code and have no problem understanding this. Why is this so difficult > > for the Linux brain share to absorb? > > Why is it so difficult to understand dual licensing? Maybe because Reyk's code was never dual-licensed? C. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists