linux-kernel - Re: That whole "Linux stealing our code" thing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f34ca13c0709011839yb32f419s20c259cbaabdd132@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 1 Sep 2007 21:39:02 -0400
From:	"Constantine A. Murenin" <mureninc@...il.com>
To:	"Jeff Garzik" <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc:	"Jason Dixon" <jason@...ongroup.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	jirislaby@...il.com, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: That whole "Linux stealing our code" thing

On 01/09/07, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org> wrote:
> Jason Dixon wrote:
> > Once the grantor (Reyk) releases his code under that license, it must
> > remain.  You are free to derive work and redistribute under your
> > license, but the original copyright and license permission remains
> > intact.  Many other entities (Microsoft, Apple, Sun, etc) have used BSD
> > code and have no problem understanding this.  Why is this so difficult
> > for the Linux brain share to absorb?
>
> Why is it so difficult to understand dual licensing?

Maybe because Reyk's code was never dual-licensed?

C.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/