[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m18x7ozqfy.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2007 15:51:29 -0600
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sysctl: Deprecate sys_sysctl in a user space visible fashion.
Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk> writes:
> On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 01:56:33PM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> - I think all that is left is superblock handling and some backward
>> compatibility magic. (Using the follow_link trick to automatically
>> mount /proc/sys)
>
> NAK. Let's explicitly mount this stuff in init scripts; it won't break
> on older kernels and there's no excuse for that kind of kludges in the
> kernel.
I don't much care. But we do have the infrastructure for it in the
kernel and NFS uses it. And it seems like a nice way to preserve user
space backwards compatibility, without making the code to nasty.
If we don't mind that bit of change that would make it harder to
upgrade a kernel I don't mind not doing it. It just looks like a
elegant way to handle that implementation change.
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists