linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.23-rc4-mm1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070902014610.GA15533@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date:	Sun, 2 Sep 2007 09:46:10 +0800
From:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To:	Satyam Sharma <satyam@...radead.org>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.23-rc4-mm1

On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 02:39:15AM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
> 
> Tangential, but I've often wondered what are the upsides of keeping
> CONFIG_CRYPTO_ALGAPI as a separate config option in the first place? Every
> single item in crypto/ ends up "select"ing it (directly or transitively)
> so it makes all sense to just do away with it and keep it == CONFIG_CRYPTO
> in the Makefile, thusly:

NACK.  ALGAPI exists so that it can be built as a module, as
opposed to CRYPTO which is always built-in.  It's already
invisible to the user so I don't see why you have a problem
with it.

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/