[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070902072806.GC5075@elte.hu>
Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 09:28:06 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Venki Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Track accurate idle time with tick_sched.idle_sleeptime
* Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
> Venki Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com> writes:
> >
> > +void tick_nohz_stop_idle(int cpu)
> > +{
> > + struct tick_sched *ts = &per_cpu(tick_cpu_sched, cpu);
> > +
> > + if (ts->idle_active) {
> > + ktime_t now, delta;
> > + now = ktime_get();
>
> That could be PM timer read costing thousands of cycles.
>
> For going into idle it's probably not a real problem, but it could
> seriously affect out of idle latencies.
at least the current out-of-idle code already does what amounts to a
PM-timer read when exiting from C2 or C3 mode. The
sched_clock_idle_sleep_event() and sched_clock_idle_wakeup_event()
callbacks utilize this already existing time information.
> You would really need a cheaper per CPU timer that doesn't stop in
> idle (which rules out sched_clock). It's all unfortunately quite
> messy.
yep.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists