[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200709020344.51437.rob@landley.net>
Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 03:44:51 -0500
From: Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sysctl: Deprecate sys_sysctl in a user space visible fashion.
On Saturday 01 September 2007 5:16:03 pm Andi Kleen wrote:
> Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net> writes:
> > A lot of embedded people like to configure /proc out of the kernel for
> > space reasons. This would make that noticeably more painful.
>
> I had a patch for a sysctl_name(2) for this a long time ago.
> If it was a serious issue that could be reintroduced.
>
> BTW sysctl(2) only needs to be quiet for a single sysctl used
> by glibc.
>
> -Andi
Yeah, I found it:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2003/7/10/345
I think that if /proc/sys could be broken out as a separate filesystem, and it
was small and simple, the embedded people would probably be happy. Is your
patch significantly smaller than such a filesystem would be? (Keeping in
mind that the smallest thing you can do is run from initramfs, and I think
that's pulling in libfs already...)
Rob
--
"One of my most productive days was throwing away 1000 lines of code."
- Ken Thompson.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists