linux-kernel - Re: [ANNOUNCE] GIT 1.5.3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7vejhgob2j.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
Date:	Sun, 02 Sep 2007 17:19:00 -0700
From:	Junio C Hamano <junkio@...ox.com>
To:	Sean <seanlkml@...patico.ca>
Cc:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, David Kastrup <dak@....org>,
	git@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] GIT 1.5.3

Sean <seanlkml@...patico.ca> writes:

> On Sun, 02 Sep 2007 15:13:09 -0700
> Junio C Hamano <gitster@...ox.com> wrote:
> ...
>> For majority of general public, I thought the spec file _I_
>> ship, along with RPM files _I_ build, are contrib status
>> already.  Don't distro people do their own RPM packages, instead
>> of using what I placed on k.org?
>
> Didn't know you used RPM yourself, so I guess this is just
> a case of something slipping through rather than the spec file
> needing a maintainer.

Well, I do not _use_ it, but the RPM I have on k.org and mention
as part of the announcement are built by me by typing "make
rpm".  What I meant to say was that these RPM files may not be
"official" at all from the point of view of distro users, and I
suspect that distro "package maintainers" for git would not be
doing just a plain vanilla "make rpm" using the spec file that
comes as part of git.git repository.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/