linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 09/32] Unionfs: cache-coherency

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0709031622360.24179@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Date:	Mon, 3 Sep 2007 16:23:21 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
To:	Josef 'Jeff' Sipek <jsipek@...sunysb.edu>
cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, hch@...radead.org,
	viro@....linux.org.uk, bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	j.blunck@...harburg.de, Erez Zadok <ezk@...sunysb.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/32] Unionfs: cache-coherency - dentries


On Sep 3 2007 10:08, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
>> >+int is_newer_lower(const struct dentry *dentry)
>> 
>> Could use bool and true/false as return value.
> 
>I remember that way back when there was a discussion about the bool type.
>What how did that end? Is bool preferred?

Well if there were objections, it would not be in the tree.


	Jan
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/