linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL -mm] Unionfs/fsstack/eCryptfs updates/cleanups/fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200709031618.l83GIfsU005109@agora.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu>
Date:	Mon, 3 Sep 2007 12:18:41 -0400
From:	Erez Zadok <ezk@...sunysb.edu>
To:	Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com>
Cc:	"Josef 'Jeff' Sipek" <jsipek@...sunysb.edu>,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, hch@...radead.org,
	viro@....linux.org.uk, bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	j.blunck@...harburg.de
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL -mm] Unionfs/fsstack/eCryptfs updates/cleanups/fixes 

In message <200709030648.20267.a1426z@...ab.com>, Al Boldi writes:
> Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
> > The following is a series of patches related to Unionfs, which include
> > three small VFS/fsstack patches and one eCryptfs patch; the rest are
> > Unionfs patches.  The patches here represent several months of work and
> > testing under various conditions, especially low-memory, SMP, and
> > preemption situations with an assortment of lower systems: ext2/3/4, xfs,
> > reiserfs, nfs, jffs2, ramfs, tmpfs, cramfs, and squashfs.
> 
> To increase test-usage, it may be critical to always backport at least to
> the latest stable release, like 2.6.22.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> --
> Al

Al, we have back-ports of the latest Unionfs to 2.6.{22,21,20,19,18,9}, all
in http://unionfs.filesystems.org/.  Before we release any change, we test
it on all back-ports as well as the latest -rc/-mm code base (takes over 24
hours straight to get through all of our regressions :-)

So we'd be happy to submit those patches to the latest stable kernel.  But,
are you talking about VFS/ecryptfs patches (which are in the stable kernel),
or are you talking about Unionfs (which is not)?

Thanks,
Erez.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/