[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200709032126.47232.a1426z@gawab.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 21:26:47 +0300
From: Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com>
To: Erez Zadok <ezk@...sunysb.edu>
Cc: "Josef 'Jeff' Sipek" <jsipek@...sunysb.edu>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, hch@...radead.org,
viro@....linux.org.uk, bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
j.blunck@...harburg.de
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL -mm] Unionfs/fsstack/eCryptfs updates/cleanups/fixes
Erez Zadok wrote:
> Al, we have back-ports of the latest Unionfs to 2.6.{22,21,20,19,18,9},
> all in http://unionfs.filesystems.org/. Before we release any change, we
> test it on all back-ports as well as the latest -rc/-mm code base (takes
> over 24 hours straight to get through all of our regressions :-)
I am impressed, thanks!
It's probably a good idea to always point these backports out, whenever
submitting patches against -mm. Otherwise, people might forget.
> So we'd be happy to submit those patches to the latest stable kernel.
> But, are you talking about VFS/ecryptfs patches (which are in the stable
> kernel), or are you talking about Unionfs (which is not)?
I'm talking about Unionfs, which seems like a rather critical feature to
miss-out on. BTW, did you ever get that oops-on-umount worked out?
Thanks!
--
Al
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists