linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2 -mm] kexec based hibernation: kexec jump

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070903031145.GF21721@ucw.cz>
Date:	Mon, 3 Sep 2007 03:11:45 +0000
From:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:	"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
Cc:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	nigel@...el.suspend2.net,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Jeremy Maitin-Shepard <jbms@....edu>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	Kexec Mailing List <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2 -mm] kexec based hibernation: kexec jump

Hi!

> > > @@ -94,6 +94,10 @@
> > >  		unsigned long start_address,
> > >  		unsigned int has_pae) ATTRIB_NORET;
> > >  
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_JUMP
> > > +extern asmlinkage int machine_kexec_real_jump(void *buf);
> > > +#endif
> > 
> > Is it really neccessery to have ifdef here?
> 
> It is not necessary. I will fix it in the next version.

Looking forward to next version :-).

> > > +#define CR3	0x18
> > > +#define CR4	0x1c
> > > +#define FLAG	0x20
> > > +#define RET	0x24
> > 
> > Hmm, is this enough? Should it use struct ptregs for normal registers?
> > What about segment registers -- they could change between kernel
> > version. Should some kind of 'version of kjump protocol' be
> > introduced?
> 
> All "preserve" registers defined in ABI are saved, I think that is
> sufficient. The "swsusp_arch_suspend" saves only these registers too.
> 
> An extensible inter-kernel kjump protocol and corresponding version
> number seems sensible. I will work on this.

Ok, perhaps that can wait after initial merge.

> > What about CX/DX/fpu state? GDT pointer?
> > 
> > Actually I think that you _do_ need to save FPU. You should probably
> > use relevant swsusp parts here.
> 
> Before and after "machine_kexec_jump" is called, the
> save_processor_state() and restore_processor_state() are called, where
> the MTRR/FPU/GDT/IDT/TR/segments/cr are saved and restored. These two
> functions come from swsusp. Thanks swsusp guys. :)

So I'm blind. Sorry for the noise.
									Pavel

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/