linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Blackfin BF54x NAND Flash Controller driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1188876109.6319.9.camel@roc-desktop>
Date:	Tue, 04 Sep 2007 11:21:49 +0800
From:	Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@...log.com>
To:	Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com>
Cc:	bryan.wu@...log.com, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Blackfin BF54x NAND Flash Controller driver

On Mon, 2007-09-03 at 13:57 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On 9/3/07, Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@...log.com> wrote:
> > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/Kconfig
> > @@ -131,6 +131,24 @@ config MTD_NAND_AU1550
> > +config MTD_NAND_BF54X
> > +       tristate "NAND Flash support for Blackfin BF54X SoC DSP"
> 
> i'd just describe it as "Blackfin on-chip NAND" rather than sticking
> in exact part numbers as i imagine we can extend it down the line
> 
> > +         This enables the NAND flash controller on the BF54X SoC DPSs
> 
> "BF54X SoC DPSs" -> "BF54x SoC DSPs"
> 
> > +         No board specific support is done by this driver, each board
> > +         must advertise a platform_device for the driver to attach.
> 
> should mention the module name when built as a module
> 

I will get rid of this BF54X and use BF5XX for (BF54x and BF52x and
future processor)

> > +config MTD_NAND_BF54X_HWECC
> > +       bool "BF54X NAND Hardware ECC"
> > +       depends on MTD_NAND_BF54X
> > +       help
> > +         Enable the use of the BF54X's internal ECC generator when
> > +         using NAND. Early versions of the chip have had problems with
> > +         incorrect ECC generation, and if using these, the default of
> > +         software ECC is preferable.
> 
> rather than advertising this, i'd just keep it in the driver ...
> presumably there are anomaly #'s for when the ECC is wrong, so we can
> make the code depend on those
> -mike

This option is quite common in the NAND driver. If there are anomaly
#'s, code can still depend on those by using hardware_ecc varible. This
option is very useful when someone need software_ecc.

Thanks
- Bryan Wu
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/