linux-kernel - What's happening with the cpuidle code?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <46DDC462.2040309@redhat.com>
Date:	Tue, 04 Sep 2007 16:47:30 -0400
From:	Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>
To:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:	Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>
Subject: What's happening with the cpuidle code?

A look at the 'cpuidle' branch of git-acpi shows a commit
e40cede7d63a029e92712a3fe02faee60cc38fb4, "cpuidle: first
round of documentation updates" that doesn't show up in that
branch online. The entire Documentation/cpuidle directory
is missing from the tree when looking at the web pages, and
it's missing from git-acpi.patch in 2.6.23-rc4-mm1 (but the
patch shows up in the summary information in the patch
header.) Where did it go? And how can -mm be used to test
things if its patches don't even match their own headers?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/