[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0709042047380.7231@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 20:48:20 -0700 (PDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: Mike Travis <travis@....com>, steiner@....com, ak@...e.de,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] x86: Convert cpu_sibling_map to be a per cpu variable
(v2) (fwd)
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > My question though, would include/linux/smp.h be the appropriate place for
> > the above define? (That is, if the above approach is the correct one... ;-)
>
> It'd be better to convert the unconverted architectures?
That is certainly the cleanest solution. Maybe we can only convert the
variables used in the scheduler that way?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists