linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/6] x86: Convert cpu_sibling_map to be a per cpu variable (v2) (fwd)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 4 Sep 2007 20:48:20 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc:	Mike Travis <travis@....com>, steiner@....com, ak@...e.de,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] x86: Convert cpu_sibling_map to be a per cpu variable
 (v2) (fwd)

On Tue, 4 Sep 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:

> > My question though, would include/linux/smp.h be the appropriate place for
> > the above define?  (That is, if the above approach is the correct one... ;-)
> 
> It'd be better to convert the unconverted architectures?

That is certainly the cleanest solution. Maybe we can only convert the 
variables used in the scheduler that way?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/