linux-kernel - Re: recent nfs change causes autofs regression

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3558.1189006671@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 05 Sep 2007 16:37:51 +0100
From:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:	Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>
Cc:	dhowells@...hat.com, Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>,
	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Frank van Maarseveen <frankvm@...nkvm.com>,
	Hua Zhong <hzhong@...il.com>,
	"'Linux Kernel Mailing List'" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: recent nfs change causes autofs regression

Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net> wrote:

> But what about mounting with different protocol, tcp vs udp for example.

I was referring specifically to the R/O / R/W variants of the same mount.  Any
flag variation that varies the way the NFS client talks to the NFS server must
either result in a new superblock or be ignored.

David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/