linux-kernel - Why do so many machines need "noapic"?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <46DF3BFF.9000809@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 05 Sep 2007 19:30:07 -0400
From:	Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>
To:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?

Some systems lock up without the noapic option. I found one
that will freeze while trying to set up the timer interrupt.
Passing 'nolapic' makes it freeze just after:

   Setting up timer through ExtINT... works

Sometimes it will boot up and then freeze during the startup
scripts. Passing the noapic option fixes all that, but it
then gets 1000 spurious interrupts per second on IRQ7 (which
only shows ehci using it.) Kernel version is 2.6.22.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/