[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <h87in5sgal.fsf@pepelac.englab.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 09:49:22 +0200
From: Anton Arapov <aarapov@...hat.com>
To: James Pearson <james-p@...ing-picture.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Guy Streeter <guy.streeter@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 4096 byte limit to /proc/PID/environ ?
Hey guys, the future of this patch is important for me. What do you think, has this patch any chances to be committed to upstream?
James Pearson <james-p@...ing-picture.com> writes:
> H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> There isn't that much that is duplicated - and there are also bits of
> the /proc/PID/mem code that are not needed in this case, so I'm not
> really sure if it is worth doing.
>
> I did submit a patch a few months ago - see:
>
> <http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=117862109623007&w=2>
--
Anton Arapov, <aarapov@...hat.com>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists