linux-kernel - Re: kernel BUG at mm/slab.c:2980 (was Re: [<c019c63f>] xfs_bmap_search_multi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BAY103-DAV12D93B7C4F6214C867EE70B2CB0@phx.gbl>
Date:	Wed, 5 Sep 2007 10:12:56 +0200
From:	"Marco Berizzi" <pupilla@...mail.com>
To:	"Christoph Lameter" <clameter@....com>
Cc:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "David Chinner" <dgc@....com>,
	<xfs@....sgi.com>, <mel@...net.ie>,
	"Marco Berizzi" <pupilla@...mail.com>
Subject: Re: kernel BUG at mm/slab.c:2980 (was Re: [<c019c63f>] xfs_bmap_search_multi_extents+0x6f/0xe0)

"Christoph Lameter" wrote:


> On Tue, 4 Sep 2007, Marco Berizzi wrote:
>
> > After a week uptime I got this error. I hope it
> > will be useful for you.
>
> Yes indeed but this is a different type of failure. Looks like a
higher
> allocation failure in the networking code. Someone created objects
that
> required an order 2 allocations that failed.
>
> > SLUB: Genslabs=22, HWalign=32, Order=0-1, MinObjects=4, CPUs=1,
Nodes=1
>
> Slub is restricted to order 0 and 1 allocs.
>
> >   PREFETCH window: e5c00000-e7cfffff
> > NET: Registered protocol family 2
> > IP route cache hash table entries: 2048 (order: 1, 8192 bytes)
> > TCP established hash table entries: 8192 (order: 4, 65536 bytes)
> > TCP bind hash table entries: 8192 (order: 3, 32768 bytes)
>
> Hmmmm.
>
> > eth2:  setting full-duplex.
> > swapper: page allocation failure. order:2, mode:0x4020
> >  [<c013b21d>] __alloc_pages+0x1ed/0x2e0
> >  [<c014ee3b>] allocate_slab+0x4b/0x90
> >  [<c014eef2>] new_slab+0x32/0x150
> >  [<c014f47b>] __slab_alloc+0xcb/0x120
> >  [<c014f429>] __slab_alloc+0x79/0x120
> >  [<c02b0183>] tcp_collapse+0x113/0x3b0
>
> tcp_collapse? This is due to a network configuration that required an
> order 2 kmalloc block. Jumbo frames?

I don't use jumbo frames. Hardware is
very old (celeron with 3com 3c905).


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/