[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <831535.32703.qm@web32610.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 01:54:28 -0700 (PDT)
From: Martin Knoblauch <knobi@...bisoft.de>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@...e.de>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: "Jeffrey W. Baker" <jwbaker@....org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: huge improvement with per-device dirty throttling
--- Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@...e.de> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 01:05:13PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Ok perhaps the new adaptive dirty limits helps your single disk
> > a lot too. But your improvements seem to be more "collateral
> damage" @)
> >
> > But if that was true it might be enough to just change the dirty
> limits
> > to get the same effect on your system. You might want to play with
> > /proc/sys/vm/dirty_*
>
> The adaptive dirty limit is per task so it can't be reproduced with
> global sysctl. It made quite some difference when I researched into
> it
> in function of time. This isn't in function of time but it certainly
> makes a lot of difference too, actually it's the most important part
> of the patchset for most people, the rest is for the corner cases
> that
> aren't handled right currently (writing to a slow device with
> writeback cache has always been hanging the whole thing).
didn't see that remark before. I just realized that "slow device with
writeback cache" pretty well describes the CCISS controller in the
DL380g4. Could you elaborate why that is a problematic case?
Cheers
Martin
------------------------------------------------------
Martin Knoblauch
email: k n o b i AT knobisoft DOT de
www: http://www.knobisoft.de
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists