linux-kernel - Re: _syscall0 exists or obsolete in 2.6

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <653402b90709050218v1b2db724na43dc342d4b8d408@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 5 Sep 2007 11:18:21 +0200
From:	"Miguel Ojeda" <maxextreme@...il.com>
To:	"Jaswinder Singh" <jaswinderlinux@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: _syscall0 exists or obsolete in 2.6

On 9/5/07, Jaswinder Singh <jaswinderlinux@...il.com> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I am trying to add syscall in include/asm/unistd.h:

Which platform?

>
> static inline _syscall0(int,my_sys_call);
>
> But I am getting following errors :
>
>   AS      arch/arm/kernel/entry-common.o

Assuming arm, I don't see that include/asm-arm/unistd.h has 622 lines.

> include/asm/unistd.h: Assembler messages:
> include/asm/unistd.h:622: Error: bad instruction `static inline int
> my_sys_call(void){register long __res_r0 __asm__("r0")'
> include/asm/unistd.h:622: Error: bad instruction `long __res'
> include/asm/unistd.h:622: Error: bad instruction `__asm__
> __volatile__("swi\t""(0x900000+322)""":"=r"(__res_r0)::"memory")'
> include/asm/unistd.h:622: Error: bad instruction `do {if((unsigned
> long)(__res)>=(unsigned long)(-129)){errno=-(__res)'
> include/asm/unistd.h:622: Error: junk at end of line, first
> unrecognized character is `}'
> include/asm/unistd.h:622: Error: junk at end of line, first
> unrecognized character is `}'
> include/asm/unistd.h:622: Error: junk at end of line, first
> unrecognized character is `}'
> make[1]: *** [arch/arm/kernel/entry-common.o] Error 1
> make: *** [arch/arm/kernel] Error 2
>
>
> This was working in older versions.
>
> I am curious _syscall0 still exists or obsolete in 2.6 linux.
>
> And I have noticed even if I commented _syscall0 macro, I do not get
> any errors so no body is using it , then why _syscall0 is in kernel
> header files and what is the substitute of _syscall0.

Well, if you look at

http://lxr.linux.no/ident?i=_syscall0

it seems it is pretty obsolete.

-- 
Miguel Ojeda
http://maxextreme.googlepages.com/index.htm
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/