[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46E02CF5.3020301@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 12:38:13 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
safari-kernel@...ari.iki.fi
Subject: Re: [PATCH] prevent kswapd from freeing excessive amounts of lowmem
Andrew Morton wrote:
> I guess for a very small upper zone and a very large lower zone this could
> still put the scan balancing out of whack, fixable by a smarter version of
> "8*zone->pages_high" but it doesn't seem very likely that this will affect
> things much.
>
> Why doesn't direct reclaim need similar treatment?
Because we only go into the direct reclaim path once
every zone is at or below zone->pages_low, and the
direct reclaim path will exit once we have freed more
than swap_cluster_max pages.
--
Politics is the struggle between those who want to make their country
the best in the world, and those who believe it already is. Each group
calls the other unpatriotic.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists